OPINIONS NEEDED

[Rebel Ranger]

I've heard this argument before, and especially when insurance was looking at totaling my vehicle. The idea that a vehicle has no loss of value that has structural frame damage and is then repaired by bending the frame back in place, or even cutting the frame and welding portions back on, is laughable. The vehicle didn't come like that from the factory, because it would obviously be inferior to a non-bent/re-straightened frame. Why then would the vehicle have the exact same value after having the frame tampered with?

If two identical vehicles are for sale, except one has a structural damage-flagged title, and the frame has been bent and then straightened...do you really consider that they'd still be sold for the exact same amount?

Because it is psychological, and people don‘t understand the work done in body repair by qualified technicians.

Sponsored