Search results

so interesting...I had the opposite reaction, I thought the Ranger was very underpowered - granted it was a crew cab.

I am failing to see any major difference lol

Whole that Gladiator looks bad ass!! They are too pricey though.

same here...plus I only saw a 0.4mpg improvement in my F150 2.7....why the hell go through all this trouble for nothing?! I know it’s EPA’s fault though. I gladly disabled mine!

Canada discounts are huge...$4k on the hood, still doesn’t make up the difference - the F150 has $12k, so it’s a non brainer to buy one over the Ranger.

So shocking! Most of you guys are driving F150 2.7L without the same grunt...Ford should have dropped that engine in the Ranger instead.

I haven’t seen one in the wild yet....beyond the 8 the local dealer I deal with has in stock, including the one in blue I test drive. I am quite surprised by this...we are in SUV and Truck territory...and I have seen many new Blazers, Passports. Maybe sales for the Ranger aren’t as strong as...

Did I see 7.3s on 87?

:) I forgot to say that it’s a F150 4wd 2.7L with Sport package and 20in rims :p... Seriously though I wanted to say thanks for everyone in this thread, the mpg of folks here is what helped me make my decision to buy a F150 (obviously after some research too...).

I am averaging 22.5mpg and my truck only has 300 miles! Very much 50/50 commute with heavy traffic.