Sponsored

Search results

  1. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Possibly you would not. To each their own. I wanted a slightly larger tire to fill the wheel well so that's what I went with. There is a noticeable difference in size -
  2. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    I went 2" on the front for a slight rake. I had to go with replacement intrusion beams and modify buy mudflaps to eliminate the rub. I can't say if a 2.5 would give you the clearance you would need. I'd search the forums and see who else might have that combo.
  3. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    The ring is sometimes needed with after market rims to center the wheel on the hub and align it with the axle. The rings are vehicle and wheel specific. For the Method rims I bought, these are the rings that fit -...
  4. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Bug guard is an Aeroskin 2. https://accessories.ford.com/products/ranger-2019-2021-aeroskin-ii-black-textured-hood-deflector-1
  5. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Yup that's correct. And no spacers. Just the hub centric rings to help keep them balanced. Tires came inflated to 75lbs, but I aired them down to 60 for a bit more comfortable ride.
  6. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Here's another...
  7. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Sure. Here you go...
  8. Method 316 / BFG 265/70/r18

    Loving the combo. Eibach 2.5 lift isn't quite enough so I got new intrusion beams on order.





Top