New Intercooler

FireSpark

Active Member
First Name
Dustin
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
36
Reaction score
135
Location
North Texas
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4
Occupation
Real Estate
I wonder what aftermarket charge pipes will work with it.
I've heard that mishimotos intercooler won't fit nicely with other charge pipes, i.e. AFE.
I could be mistaken though.
 

taildraggerpilot

Well-Known Member
First Name
Carl
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
200
Reaction score
628
Location
Kennesaw, GA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger Lariat FX4, 2022 MINI JCW Hardtop
Occupation
Boeing Driver
I wonder what aftermarket charge pipes will work with it.
I've heard that mishimotos intercooler won't fit nicely with other charge pipes, i.e. AFE.
I could be mistaken though.
Mishimoto charge pipes reuse the factory intercooler couplings. I don’t see how there intercooler would not play nicely with other charge pipe fabricators. Perhaps you have the wrong culprit in mind.
 

Racket

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
21
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
2,407
Location
Here and There
Vehicle(s)
2019 Lariat Supercrew 2WD
Occupation
Transient
What I'm reading (besides the article's pitch for Livernois' tuning) is there is more flow to their intercooler over stock=lower temps=more horsepower. Pretty sure that would apply to any replacement IC yet has that been shown?

It makes sense at face value but I'd expect that - besides a tune - there would need to be other mechanical upgrades in addition.
 

Dgc333

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
1,568
Reaction score
3,526
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
21 Ranger Lariat
Occupation
Engineer
Intercoolers don't make more power, they cool the air coming from the turbo so the ECU doesn't pull timing which reduces power. A good intercooler will allow the tune to be more aggressive which will make more power.

The intercooler that the factory uses on the Ecoboost Mustang is woefully undersize. Even after one 0 to 60 run it is overwhelmed heat soaks and no longer effectively cools the charge and the power drops off dramatically. The concensus is you need to upgrade the intercooler before making any other performance mods.

The Ranger intercooler is significantly larger than the Mustangs. In the short time I have had my Ranger I have not experienced any heat soak. I would think that in the case of the Ranger it is not as important to upgrade it.
 


Rviator

Well-Known Member
First Name
Doug
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Threads
20
Messages
447
Reaction score
870
Location
FLA
Vehicle(s)
A 2019 Ford Ranger of course, and a 2015 Yamaha YZF-R3
Occupation
retired aerospace engineer
Vehicle Showcase
1
How is this claim of "80% colder than stock" calculated? Are they using Fahrenheit, Celsius, or perhaps from absolute zero? Hmmm
 
OP
OP
Gsxrdoug

Gsxrdoug

Well-Known Member
First Name
Doug
Joined
Aug 13, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
478
Reaction score
1,338
Location
Hawaii -- Oahu
Vehicle(s)
2021 ranger, XLT 4x4, Cactus Gray
Occupation
Therapist -- Retired Navy
How is this claim of "80% colder than stock" calculated? Are they using Fahrenheit, Celsius, or perhaps from absolute zero? Hmmm
No Idea.
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
384
Reaction score
711
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
With a front grill that maximizes airflow over the intercooler (like the one in my avatar) I consistently log ACT temps only 7 deg over IAT. From a cooling perspective, the factory Ranger intercooler is very efficient when max airflow is achieved over its surface area.

Mishimoto found minimal temp drop on its intercooler too (they published the data). The only way they made more power was adding on the intercooler pipes. This shows that the intercooler can prove to be a restriction to the intake path, and letting things breath easier between the turbo and throttle body is beneficial. So to gain any real benefit from an aftermarket intercooler it needs to be paired up with some bigger aftermarket charge pipes. But again, the power addition is not from IC cooling efficiency, but from flow efficiency.
 

Danager

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Apr 3, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
3,602
Location
Alberta
Vehicle(s)
2019 Edge
Occupation
Manager
How is this claim of "80% colder than stock" calculated? Are they using Fahrenheit, Celsius, or perhaps from absolute zero? Hmmm
Questioning the validity of the claim and the process?
As for units, it doesn’t matter. They could use MTTU (monkey testicle thermal units). Units are units and math is math.
 

BassRanger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Al
Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
351
Reaction score
929
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger Supercab STX, 2010 Mustang
Occupation
Goodyear
The direct quote is " increases cooling capability 80 percent over the stock Ford Ranger setup". If they are saying they managed to increase thermal efficiency of that system by 80%, I would really like to see that data. That is a substantial increase in cooling capacity.

I'm a bit perplexed at the demand for aftermarket intercoolers for these trucks. To my knowledge, no one has effectively demonstrated a need. Because this is a truck, Ford could not skimp on the charge cooler. In towing situations these engines can be exposed to long periods of sustained boost. If the charge cooler was inadequate, these engines would eventually start suffering from temp creep and would end up overheating. 3 years in and I haven't seen any reports of this.

Not to say that improvements can't be made, but with these $600+ units are you actually getting? Better 1/4 mile times, quicker 0-60, better towing performance, better passing performance? At some point all this theory has to manifest into some tangible performance benefit, and you would sale a lot more product if you could clearly demonstrate this benefit. Mishimoto is the only company I've seen post some actual coherent data, and it was honestly underwhelming.
 

Gixxers

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joshua
Joined
Nov 21, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
124
Reaction score
72
Location
15644
Vehicle(s)
2020 ranger
Occupation
Steelworkers
With a front grill that maximizes airflow over the intercooler (like the one in my avatar) I consistently log ACT temps only 7 deg over IAT. From a cooling perspective, the factory Ranger intercooler is very efficient when max airflow is achieved over its surface area.

Mishimoto found minimal temp drop on its intercooler too (they published the data). The only way they made more power was adding on the intercooler pipes. This shows that the intercooler can prove to be a restriction to the intake path, and letting things breath easier between the turbo and throttle body is beneficial. So to gain any real benefit from an aftermarket intercooler it needs to be paired up with some bigger aftermarket charge pipes. But again, the power addition is not from IC cooling efficiency, but from flow efficiency.
What grill are you running?
 

Superdannyboy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Threads
24
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
1,350
Location
75209
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Ranger XLT Sport Appearance Package
What if I said that bigger charge pipes were the real bang for the buck and that buying an IC after that is a lot of money for little gain, what would you guys argue? *sips coffee*
 

importfighter01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
384
Reaction score
711
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger XL SuperCab
What if I said that bigger charge pipes were the real bang for the buck and that buying an IC after that is a lot of money for little gain, what would you guys argue? *sips coffee*
Mishimoto has the data on bigger charge pipes posted on their website. So does aFe.
 
 



Top