forscan tire size wiki

charwest

Well-Known Member
First Name
char & tony
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Threads
42
Messages
335
Reaction score
727
Location
On the road
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XL FX4 Supercab
Occupation
Healthcare
Given how many people are changing tires, and the ease of just putting "mm circumference" in forscan to fix speedo error, I was surprised about how every thread I read seemed to suggest there was a lot of trial and error in getting the circumference right to actually match GPS speeds.

I envision this as a spreadsheet where people can update with their data, so that future people mounting the same tires wont have to do all the legwork.



If you reply to this thread, I can add the data to the google spreadsheet so it will show up here without hunting down the thread.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

BcP28

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bennett
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
188
Reaction score
720
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford F150, 2015 Ford Edge Sport
Occupation
Engineer
Helpful tip... if you consider the "Tire Squash Factor" when you calculate tire circumference, you'll be much closer to the true tire diameter that the vehicle needs in order to show the correct speed in the cluster. Accounting for the effective radius with a nominally compressed sidewall will be closer than the theoretical unloaded diameter will, as a place to start anyways.

A common squash factor is 0.967. So you take the diameter provided by whatever calculator you're using (dare I say it, but there's a calculator built into the TacomaWorld forum that's pretty good too), and you multiply that by 0.967 and that should give you a much better starting point for forscan.

Example: 255/75/17 = 2558mm * 0.967 = 2474mm
 
OP
OP
charwest

charwest

Well-Known Member
First Name
char & tony
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Threads
42
Messages
335
Reaction score
727
Location
On the road
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XL FX4 Supercab
Occupation
Healthcare
Helpful tip... if you consider the "Tire Squash Factor" when you calculate tire circumference, you'll be much closer to the true tire diameter that the vehicle needs in order to show the correct speed in the cluster. Accounting for the effective radius with a nominally compressed sidewall will be closer than the theoretical unloaded diameter will, as a place to start anyways.

A common squash factor is 0.967. So you take the diameter provided by whatever calculator you're using (dare I say it, but there's a calculator built into the TacomaWorld forum that's pretty good too), and you multiply that by 0.967 and that should give you a much better starting point for forscan.

Example: 255/75/17 = 2558mm * 0.967 = 2474mm
and WHERE were you three days ago?!

four unnecessary trips to the highway and a lot of bugging my wife to read me GPS live numbers when you knew the end result down to the mm without even trying.

damn. ill go through a couple of the other numbers other forum members came up with. if that formula works there’s no reason for a wiki!

thanks. pretty awesome tip. seems like it would be worth a pin in the tire forum to me.


edit: at least in this thread (https://www.ranger5g.com/forum/threads/forscan-speedo-calibration-for-larger-tires.4200/) two of the posters would be really close with your formula (or the basically similar formula where you substract 3.2 0r 3.3%), and this formula works within a few mm for the stock fx4 tire, but the other two posters which gave enough info for me to do the calc would be off by 20 or 30mm. assuming their GPS data really confirms the right number, maybe there is something to some empiric data after all, and hence a wiki?
 
Last edited:

Adventure Ranger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
142
Reaction score
443
Location
Saskatchewan, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ford Ranger Lariate Crew Cab FX4 Sport
Occupation
Heavy Equipment / Truck shop Foreman
Vehicle Showcase
1
Toyo Open Country AT2 AW P265/70R17
Calculated size = 2520mm Forscan = 2400mm
Confirmed with I-phone GPS and Garmin GPS
FX4 Crew Cab Lariate w/2" BDS front lift on truck
 

BcP28

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bennett
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
188
Reaction score
720
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford F150, 2015 Ford Edge Sport
Occupation
Engineer
and WHERE were you three days ago?!

four unnecessary trips to the highway and a lot of bugging my wife to read me GPS live numbers when you knew the end result down to the mm without even trying.

damn. ill go through a couple of the other numbers other forum members came up with. if that formula works there’s no reason for a wiki!

thanks. pretty awesome tip. seems like it would be worth a pin in the tire forum to me.


edit: at least in this thread (https://www.ranger5g.com/forum/threads/forscan-speedo-calibration-for-larger-tires.4200/) two of the posters would be really close with your formula (or the basically similar formula where you substract 3.2 0r 3.3%), and this formula works within a few mm for the stock fx4 tire, but the other two posters which gave enough info for me to do the calc would be off by 20 or 30mm. assuming their GPS data really confirms the right number, maybe there is something to some empiric data after all, and hence a wiki?
Haha my bad! But yeah, that squash factor should get you close, but you may have some fine tuning depending on the tire, since different constructions, load ranges, tread compounds, etc are going to drive differences in nominal tire radius, so group feedback is still helpful for common tires.
 


OP
OP
charwest

charwest

Well-Known Member
First Name
char & tony
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Threads
42
Messages
335
Reaction score
727
Location
On the road
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger XL FX4 Supercab
Occupation
Healthcare
Haha my bad! But yeah, that squash factor should get you close, but you may have some fine tuning depending on the tire, since different constructions, load ranges, tread compounds, etc are going to drive differences in nominal tire radius, so group feedback is still helpful for common tires.
well, you predicted my size on the dot. so in my book you're still a magician.

but if people post up their data here i can keep compiling it into a master sheet for future reference
 

Jrel209

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2020
Threads
16
Messages
497
Reaction score
815
Location
Wa
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger XLT crew cab
Is there a walkthrough on how to perform these changes on forscan? Not sure where everyone is finding these numbers/options at. I found the main forscan thread but the first page doesnt have the tire size options, and theres way too many pages to go through lol
 

Jrel209

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2020
Threads
16
Messages
497
Reaction score
815
Location
Wa
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger XLT crew cab
Nm figured it out… it is really accurate using the mm x 0.976 method. Thank you for posting this info! This groups awesome haha. I fixed my tire size and turned off the dumb auto stop/start.
 

CHIEF

Active Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
13
Location
GREECE
Vehicle(s)
FORD RANGER WILDTRACK 2.0L BI TURBO
After completing the tyre circumference change in forscan how do you reset so you don't get the drive train error icon?
 
First Name
Taylor
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
Location
Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Ranger XLT
Occupation
Networking Technician
Is there a walkthrough on how to perform these changes on forscan? Not sure where everyone is finding these numbers/options at. I found the main forscan thread but the first page doesnt have the tire size options, and theres way too many pages to go through lol
Which module did you have to go into for changing the tire size? Thanks!
 

Espo78

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
177
Reaction score
387
Location
Gainesville FL
Vehicle(s)
2020 Ranger STX FX4
Vehicle Showcase
1
This "Squash factor" had me completely baffled until I realized the mm you were referencing was the circumference of the tire not the diameter. Could you update the spreadsheet to make that easier to understand?
 

Ed Low

New Member
First Name
Ed
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Location
NZ
Vehicle(s)
Ford Ranger Wildtrak X Bi-Turbo
Hi,

Can you explain how the squash factor is calculated. I can't find any reference to it when searching. My tyres are Cooper AT3 LT 275/65/18 so the circumference is 2558mm. I've input the value of 2474 using FORscan however at 50km the speedo under reads by 3km and at 100km it's 6-7km under.

I don't want to just try random numbers to get it to the correct reading if there is a formula for calculating this squash factor.
Sponsored

 
 



Top